|
|
|
|
Seventeenth Century AustreyPuritanism in the parish
Among
the factors that gave the sons of the gentry and clergy an advantage over their
neighbours was their more widespread attendance and placement in grammar schools
which gave access to the universities and thus initiated them into the ‘high
culture’ of their Age. Of the two, the clergy were usually more educated than
their gentry colleagues. While their neighbours in Appleby took an active part
in religious prophesying, maintaining links with radical puritans at Ashby and
exchanging books with kinsmen and neighbours of like mind, the parsons of
Austrey remained orthodox and avoided dabbling in religious controversy.
Not much is known of their
social origins or of their educational backgrounds, but most of them were Oxford
men (unlike their Appleby counterparts who matriculated from Cambridge). The
fact that the Austrey parsons owed their preferment to the crown may explain why
they were drawn from more distant parts. Two critical appointments were John Prior and John
Shakespeare, vicars of Austrey during the Interregnum and early Restoration
periods. Prior who retained his
position throughout the Civil War, Interregnum and Restoration, was a Magdalen
man. John Shakespeare, his
successor in 1670, was the son of a Coventry merchant and graduate of St. John's
College. The
local puritan clergy were a close-knit group who relied upon each other for
religious support and book lending helped to consolidate these connections. Thomas Walker, the rector of Grendon and Richard Latimer,
vicar of Polesworth, were two neighbouring clerics who took part in these
exchanges as shown, for example, in 1607 by Walker's bequest to Latimer of
‘one booke and my part of a booke which are both in his hands’. In the
post-war period the circle widened to include ejected ministers like Richard
Dowley at Orton, Richard Southwell, the curate of Wilnecote and Thomas Hill of
the Lea Grange, also in Orton. Hill, who drew up wills for some of the Austrey
residents was also a keen scholar, ‘a man of profound learning’ equally
proficient in Latin, Greek and Hebrew. Sources
and Notes J.
Brinsley, Ludus Literarius: or the Grammar Schoole (London, 1612); For
the use of Ashby to promote Puritanism see C. Cross, Puritan
Earl, 133-5, 139-40; Gilby himself published an edition of Calvin's
Commentaries in 1570. A.L. Hughes, ‘County community’ thesis, pp. 56-7.
Latimer was drawn into this local clerical network despite being denounced by
the puritans in 1586 as a ‘dumbe-dog’: See R. O'Day, The English Clergy, 163-4, 169.
Poverty is put forward as a possible reason why some parsons were
prevented from acquiring a good library as evinced, for example, in John
Eachard’s ‘study of a few scurvy books’, The
Grounds and Occasions of the Contempt of the Clergy and Religion, (1670),
102. J.
Foster, Alumni Oxoniensis, The Members of
the University of Oxford, 1500-1714 (Oxford, 1891) IV, 1338. Thomas
Hill’s involvement in S. Palmer, The
Nonconformists Memorial (London, 1803) III, pp. 347-9. |
|